Kraaft vs Fieldwire for Construction in 2026: Which Wins on the Jobsite?

Quick answer: For most construction and field teams, Kraaft is the faster, lower-friction choice — especially if you're coordinating subcontractors and crews who won't sit through software training. Fieldwire still fits teams whose daily work is almost entirely drawing-driven. Kraaft is used on more than 900,000 job sites across 14 countries. Start your free trial or book a demo to see it on your own sites.

Picking field management software isn't about finding the tool with the most checkboxes — it's about finding the one your crews will actually open every day. Construction teams usually land on this comparison for one of two reasons: they're outgrowing a drawing-and-spreadsheet workflow and want structured task management, or they're tired of chasing updates across text threads, email, and a half-dozen disconnected apps.

Fieldwire and Kraaft both promise to fix that, but they start from opposite ends of the problem. Fieldwire is built around the drawing set: tasks, punch lists, and RFIs all live on top of a plan. Kraaft is built around the conversation: crews chat the way they already do, and the paperwork gets generated behind the scenes. Neither approach is wrong — but one of them will fit how your teams actually work on site. Here's a detailed, side-by-side look at both.

What is Fieldwire?

Fieldwire, now part of Hilti, is a plan-centric task management tool for construction teams. It's built around digital blueprints: teams mark up drawings, link tasks to specific locations on a sheet, track punch lists, and manage RFIs and submittals on its higher-tier plans. Project engineers and superintendents use it to keep an entire drawing set current across a project's life, syncing markups and revisions so the field and the office are looking at the same version of a plan.

It's a strong fit for teams whose daily work is genuinely plan-driven — general contractors coordinating multiple trades against one set of drawings, for example — and who are willing to invest time in setting up projects, templates, and permissions to get the most out of it.

What is Kraaft?

Kraaft is a messaging-first field platform — often described as "the WhatsApp for construction sites." Crews chat, share geo-located photos, and get updates the same way they already text each other, while Kraaft turns that activity into daily reports, task tracking, and project files automatically. More than 900,000 sites across 14 countries use it, with no training required to get a crew up and running.

Rather than asking field workers to learn a new system, Kraaft meets them inside a familiar chat interface and does the structuring work in the background: photos get geotagged and filed, messages become task updates, and a day's worth of site activity turns into a clean report without anyone opening a separate reporting tool.

Where Fieldwire falls short on the jobsite

Fieldwire keeps teams inside a drawing set, which works if your daily job really is markups and punch lists. But most crews don't spend their day in blueprints — they spend it on site, and Fieldwire still asks them to open a task-and-drawing tool to report anything. Forms, BIM, and RFIs are locked behind its priciest tiers, so a team that wants the full feature set ends up paying Business Plus rates per seat rather than the advertised Pro price. And nothing about the interface is built for the way crews already communicate.

Why most field teams choose Kraaft

For nearly every other construction team, the real bottleneck isn't drawings — it's getting subcontractors, foremen, and crews to actually use the software at all. Kraaft's chat-first design removes that barrier by design: there's no project setup phase before it's useful, nothing to configure, and no training session required. Crews start chatting on day one, and reporting, task tracking, and file organization build themselves from that activity automatically — which is why teams switching from Fieldwire, WhatsApp, or paper forms tend to see faster, broader adoption with Kraaft.

Fieldwire vs Kraaft: feature by feature

• Core focus — Kraaft: team chat & automated reporting · Fieldwire: drawings & task management
• Daily field reports — Kraaft: generated automatically from chat activity · Fieldwire: built manually, from the Pro tier up
• Plan markups & drawing linking — Kraaft: via project files, not drawing-centric · Fieldwire: yes, all tiers
• Custom forms — Kraaft: all paid tiers · Fieldwire: Business tier and up
• RFIs / submittals — Kraaft: included in workflows (Pro) · Fieldwire: Business Plus only
• BIM viewer — Kraaft: not a core feature · Fieldwire: Business tier and up
• AI agents — Kraaft: included · Fieldwire: not available
• Mobile & offline access — Kraaft: yes · Fieldwire: yes
• Learning curve — Kraaft: minimal — works like a chat app · Fieldwire: moderate to high for advanced features
• Support — Kraaft: priority support (Pro), dedicated CSM (Enterprise) · Fieldwire: email (Pro+), phone (Business+)
• Integrations & API — Kraaft: native integrations included; API on Enterprise tier · Fieldwire: app integrations (Business+); API only on Custom contracts
• Company & hosting — Kraaft: European company, not US-based · Fieldwire: part of Hilti Group; US-founded platform
• Multilingual interface — Kraaft: multiple languages supported out of the box · Fieldwire: English-language interface

Pricing compared

• Free tier — Kraaft: Solo (1 user, unlimited use) · Fieldwire: Basic (5 users, 3 projects, 100 sheets)
• Entry paid plan — Kraaft: Pro, $25/user/month (4-user minimum) · Fieldwire: Pro, $39/user/month
• Mid tier — Kraaft: Pro already covers reports, forms, and workflows — no extra tier needed · Fieldwire: Business, $64/user/month
• Top tier — Kraaft: still just Pro — no premium tier required to unlock core features · Fieldwire: Business Plus, $89/user/month
• Enterprise — Kraaft: custom quote, with SSO and a dedicated CSM · Fieldwire: custom quote

Published rates as of October 2026 — see current Kraaft plans on kraaft.co. Total cost of ownership matters more than the sticker price: Fieldwire's features for daily operations — custom forms, BIM, RFIs — are spread across three paid tiers, so a team that wants the full feature set often ends up paying Business Plus rates per seat, not the advertised Pro price.

Frequently asked questions

Is Fieldwire or Kraaft better for small construction teams? Most small teams see faster results with Kraaft: the chat-first setup needs no onboarding, and the free Solo plan covers real day-to-day use. Fieldwire's free Basic plan can work too, but only if your team's main need is drawing markup rather than getting everyone to actually report from the field.

Does Kraaft replace Fieldwire's plan markup tools? Not directly. Kraaft organizes project files and photos rather than offering drawing-specific markup and sheet-compare tools. Teams that need deep plan markup alongside messaging sometimes run both; most Kraaft customers replace a mix of WhatsApp, email, and paper forms rather than a plan-viewer tool specifically.

Which tool is easier to roll out across subcontractors? Kraaft's chat-based interface needs no onboarding session for most field workers, since it works like apps they already use. Fieldwire's interface is straightforward for office staff but benefits from a short walkthrough for field crews unfamiliar with task-and-drawing software.

Can I switch from Fieldwire to Kraaft without losing historical data? Project files, photos, and reports can be exported from most field platforms, including Fieldwire, for reference. Book a demo and the Kraaft team can walk through what a migration looks like for your project history.

How to choose

Choosing between the two comes down to one question: is your bottleneck a drawing problem, or an adoption problem?

Best for Fieldwire: teams whose daily work is almost entirely organized around drawing sets, and who are ready to pay Business Plus rates to unlock RFIs, submittals, and change orders.

Best for Kraaft: everyone else — especially teams juggling subcontractors, multiple small sites, or crews who won't sit through onboarding. Here's how to find out fast:

1. List the three things your crews currently struggle to report consistently — daily logs, photos, punch items.
2. Check whether those gaps come from drawings, or from communication.
3. If it's communication, start a free Kraaft trial with one crew this week.
4. Compare how many reports get filed in week one versus your current tool.
5. Book a demo once you see the difference, to roll it out across your other sites.

The bottom line

Both tools solve real problems on a job site, but software your foremen and subcontractors won't open doesn't help anyone — however many features it has. Kraaft meets crews where they already are, in a chat thread, and handles the reporting and documentation behind the scenes without asking anyone to learn a new system first.

For most construction and field teams, that's the deciding factor, and it's why Kraaft is usually the faster, lower-friction choice. See how Kraaft automates daily reports or check current plans — most teams are up and running the same week.

Next steps

• Start a free trial with one crew this week
• See how Kraaft turns chat into daily reports
• Compare current plans before you commit

Ready to get your crews actually using the software? Start your free trial today.

‍